Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHollis, Jenna L
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Leone CA
dc.contributor.authorWhybrow, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorClark, Heather
dc.contributor.authorKyle, Janet AM
dc.contributor.authorMcNeill, Geraldine
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-19T13:00:06Z
dc.date.available2016-09-19T13:00:06Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-01
dc.identifier69874485
dc.identifier55eeb951-5b24-44ad-a356-5801250404d8
dc.identifier27618969
dc.identifier84987680735
dc.identifier.citationHollis , J L , Craig , L CA , Whybrow , S , Clark , H , Kyle , J AM & McNeill , G 2017 , ' Assessing the relative validity of the Scottish Collaborative Group FFQ for measuring dietary intake in adults ' , Public Health Nutrition , vol. 20 , no. 3 , pp. 449-455 . https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980016002421en
dc.identifier.issn1368-9800
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2164/7489
dc.descriptionAcknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Jacqueline Burr and Lindsey Shaw for collecting the data for this study. Data coding and entry for the food diaries was completed by Dr Lindsey Masson. The authors would also like to acknowledge the Scottish Health Survey Team, the Scottish Government and the National Centre for Social Research for their support in conducting this research. Financial support: This work was supported by funding from the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS) programme of the Scottish Government (J.L.H., L.C.A.C., S.W. and G.Mc.N.). The RESAS programme had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: J.L.H., L.C.A.C., S.W. and G.Mc.N. were responsible for the design of the study and formulated the research question. L.C.A.C. and S.W. carried out the study. J.L.H. completed the literature review, conducted the statistical analysis and drafted the initial paper. All authors were responsible for drafting and revising the manuscript and have approved the final version. Ethics of human subject participation: This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Rowett Human Studies Ethical Review Panel. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.en
dc.format.extent7
dc.format.extent16237
dc.format.extent82838
dc.format.extent15510
dc.format.extent19298
dc.format.extent24882
dc.format.extent92591
dc.format.extent18660
dc.format.extent177247
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Health Nutritionen
dc.subjectvalidationen
dc.subjectdietary assessmenten
dc.subjectfood frequency questionnairesen
dc.subjectepidemiologyen
dc.subjectFFQen
dc.subjectR Medicineen
dc.subject.lccRen
dc.titleAssessing the relative validity of the Scottish Collaborative Group FFQ for measuring dietary intake in adultsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Rowett Instituteen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Grampian Data Safe Haven (DaSH)en
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Other Applied Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Institute of Applied Health Sciencesen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1368980016002421


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record