Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuff, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2005-11-03T14:22:54Z
dc.date.available2005-11-03T14:22:54Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationP. Duff, 'Irregularly Obtained Real Evidence: The Scottish Solution?', International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 8 (2004), pp. 77-99.en
dc.identifier.issn1365-7127
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2164/41
dc.description.abstractIn determining whether to admit improperly obtained real evidence, the Scottish courts have engaged in a balancing act for over 50 years, weighing the public interest in the conviction of the guilty against the rights of the accused and the civil liberties of the citizenry. The Appeal Court's approach to this issue has not been particularly satisfactory and the result is an incoherent mass of detailed and often almost irreconcilable case law, rather than a principled framework to guide the trial courts in the exercise of this power.en
dc.format.extent350557 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVathek Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Evidence and Proofen
dc.relation.ispartofseries8en
dc.subjectCriminal evidenceen
dc.subjectScots Lawen
dc.titleIrregularly Obtained Real Evidence: The Scottish Solution?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record