Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMetzger, Ernest
dc.date.accessioned2005-10-25T14:17:35Z
dc.date.available2005-10-25T14:17:35Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.citationE Metzger (ed), Law For All Times: Essays in Memory of David Daube [Roman Legal Tradition, 2] (Lawrence, KS: Roman Law Society of America, 2004), 27-58.en
dc.identifier.isbn0976414902
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2164/34
dc.description.abstractThis article considers the method of argument favoured by David Daube (1909-1999), a scholar of Roman and biblical law. It suggests that Daube used a method of argument championed by Karl Popper (1992-1994), a philosopher of science.en
dc.format.extent207129 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherRoman Law Society of Americaen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRoman Legal Traditionen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2en
dc.subjectDaube, Daviden
dc.subjectPopper, Karlen
dc.subjectRoman Lawen
dc.titleQuare? Argument in David Daube, After Karl Popperen
dc.typeBook Chapteren


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record