dc.contributor.author | Metzger, Ernest | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2005-10-25T14:17:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2005-10-25T14:17:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.citation | E Metzger (ed), Law For All Times: Essays in Memory of David Daube [Roman Legal Tradition, 2] (Lawrence, KS: Roman Law Society of America, 2004), 27-58. | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 0976414902 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2164/34 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article considers the method of argument favoured by David Daube (1909-1999), a scholar of Roman and biblical law. It suggests that Daube used a method of argument championed by Karl Popper (1992-1994), a philosopher of science. | en |
dc.format.extent | 207129 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | Roman Law Society of America | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Roman Legal Tradition | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2 | en |
dc.subject | Daube, David | en |
dc.subject | Popper, Karl | en |
dc.subject | Roman Law | en |
dc.title | Quare? Argument in David Daube, After Karl Popper | en |
dc.type | Book Chapter | en |