University of Aberdeen

AURA - Aberdeen University Research Archive

View Item 
  •   AURA Home
  • 5 - All Research
  • All research
  • View Item
  •   AURA Home
  • 5 - All Research
  • All research
  • View Item
  •   AURA Home
  • 5 - All Research
  • All research
  • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Systematic review of economic evaluations of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

      View/Open
      Hernandez 2008.pdf (165.2Kb)
      Publication date
      2008
      Author
      Hernández, Rodolfo Andrés
      De Verteuil, Robyn
      Fraser, Cynthia Mary
      Vale, Luke David
      Aberdeen Health Technology Assessment Group
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      Objective Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers and the standard surgical treatment for this cancer is open resection (OS), but laparoscopic surgery (LS) may be an alternative treatment. In 2000, a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) review found little evidence on costs and cost-effectiveness in comparing the two methods. The evidence base has since expanded and this study systematically reviews the economic evaluations on the subject published since 2000. Method Systematic review of studies reporting costs and outcomes of LS vs OS for colorectal cancer. National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) methods for abstract writing were followed. Studies were summarized and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) for common outcomes were calculated. Results Five studies met the inclusion criteria. LS generally had higher healthcare costs. Most studies reported longer operational time and shorter length of stay and similar long-term outcomes with LS vs OS. Only one outcome, complications, was common across all studies but results lacked consistency (e.g. in two studies, OS was less costly but more effective; in another study, LS was less costly but more effective; and in the further two studies, LS could potentially be cost effective depending on the decision-makers' willingness to pay for the health gain). Conclusion The evidence on cost-effectiveness is not consistent. LS was generally more costly than OS. However, the effectiveness data used in individual economic evaluation were imprecise and unreliable when compared with data from systematic reviews of effectiveness. Nevertheless, short-term benefits of LS (e.g. shorter recovery) may make LS appear less costly when productivity gains are considered.
      Citation
      Hernandez, R.A., de Verteuil, R.M., Fraser, C.M., and Vale, L.D., (2008) Systematic review of economic evaluations of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Disease, 10(9), pp.859-868.
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/2164/301
      DOI
      http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01609.x
      Rights
      The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com
      Collections
      • All research

      Browse

      All of AURACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
      Top of Page
      • AURA Home
      • Accessibility
      • PURE
      • Digital Resources
      • Library, Special Collections & Museums
      • Take-Down Notice
      • Send Feedback
      • Contact Us
         
       
      Library, Special Collections and Museums logo
      The Sir Duncan Rice Library
      University of Aberdeen
      Bedford Road
      Aberdeen
      AB24 3AA

      Tel: +44 (0)1224 273330
      Email: library@abdn.ac.uk
       
         

      Share and keep up to date

      FacebookTwitterWordpress

      • AURA Home
      • Accessibility
      • PURE
      • Digital Resources
      • Library, Special Collections & Museums
      • Take-Down Notice
      • Send Feedback
      • Contact Us