| dc.contributor.author | Metzger, Ernest | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2005-10-17T15:14:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2005-10-17T15:14:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Law and History Review 22 (2004), pp. 243-75 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0738-2480 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2164/29 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article argues that there was a fashion in the 19th and early 20th centuries to view the Roman judge as a kind of authentic voice of the people, and this encouraged the view—still existing today—that a Roman judge did not take any guidance from the decisions of other judges. | en |
| dc.format.extent | 465 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
| dc.publisher | University of Illinois Press | en |
| dc.subject | Roman law | en |
| dc.subject | von Savigny, C.F. | en |
| dc.title | Roman Judges, Case Law, and Principles of Procedure | en |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en |
