Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLois, Noemien
dc.contributor.authorBurr, Jennifer Margareten
dc.contributor.authorNorrie, John Daviden
dc.contributor.authorVale, Luke Daviden
dc.contributor.authorCook, Jonathan Alistairen
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Alison Maryen
dc.contributor.authorFILMS Groupen
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-16T11:43:52Z
dc.date.available2009-03-16T11:43:52Z
dc.date.issued2008-11-03
dc.identifier.citationLois, N., Burr, J., Norrie, J., Vale, L., Cook, J., and McDonald, A. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of internal limiting membrane peeling for patients with idiopathic full thickness macular hole. Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial: FILMS (Full-thickness macular hole and Internal Limiting Membrane peeling Study). Trials, 9(61).en
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 1135754
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2164/269
dc.description.abstractBackground: A full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) is a common retinal condition associated with impaired vision. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that surgery, by means of pars plana vitrectomy and post-operative intraocular tamponade with gas, is effective for stage 2, 3 and 4 FTMH. Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling has been introduced as an additional surgical manoeuvre to increase the success of the surgery; i.e. increase rates of hole closure and visual improvement. However, little robust evidence exists supporting the superiority of ILM peeling compared with no-peeling techniques. The purpose of FILMS (Fullthickness macular hole and Internal Limiting Membrane peeling Study) is to determine whether ILM peeling improves the visual function, the anatomical closure of FTMH, and the quality of life of patients affected by this disorder, and the cost-effectiveness of the surgery. Methods/Design: Patients with stage 2–3 idiopathic FTMH of less or equal than 18 months duration (based on symptoms reported by the participant) and with a visual acuity ≤ 20/40 in the study eye will be enrolled in this FILMS from eight sites across the UK and Ireland. Participants will be randomised to receive combined cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) and pars plana vitrectomy with postoperative intraocular tamponade with gas, with or without ILM peeling. The primary outcome is distance visual acuity at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include distance visual acuity at 3 and 24 months, near visual acuity at 3, 6, and 24 months, contrast sensitivity at 6 months, reading speed at 6 months, anatomical closure of the macular hole at each time point (1, 3, 6, and 24 months), health related quality of life (HRQOL) at six months, costs to the health service and the participant, incremental costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and adverse events. Discussion: FILMS will provide high quality evidence on the role of ILM peeling in FTMH surgery. Trial registration: This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN number 33175422 and Clinical Trials.gov identifier NCT00286507.en
dc.description.sponsorshipChief Scientist Office, Scotland (project ref no CZH/4/235), NHS Grampianen
dc.format.extent264370 bytes
dc.format.extent8 p.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMCen
dc.subjectMacular Degenerationen
dc.subjectRandomised Controlled Trialen
dc.subjectSurgeryen
dc.subject.lccRE Ophthalmologyen
dc.titleClinical and cost-effectiveness of internal limiting membrane peeling for patients with idiopathic full thickness macular hole. Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial : FILMS (Full-thickness macular hole and Internal Limiting Membrane peeling Study)en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.typeTexten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen, School of Medicine & Dentistry, Division of Applied Health Sciencesen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublisher PDFen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-61en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record