Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAzuara-Blanco, Augusto
dc.contributor.authorBurr, Jennifer Margareten
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Ruth Elizabethen
dc.contributor.authorMacLennan, Graeme Stewarten
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2008-10-08T11:44:58Z
dc.date.available2008-10-08T11:44:58Z
dc.date.issued2007-12
dc.identifier.citationAzuara-Blanco, A., Burr, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., and McPherson, S. (2007) The accuracy of accredited glaucoma optometrists in the diagnosis and treatment recommendation for glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 91(12), pp. 1639-1643en
dc.identifier.issn0007-1161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2164/260
dc.description.abstractBackground/aims: To compare the diagnostic performance of accredited glaucoma optometrists (AGO) for both the diagnosis of, and decision to treat glaucoma with that of routine hospital eye care against a reference standard of expert opinion, i.e. consultant ophthalmologist with a special interest in glaucoma. Methods: A directly comparative, masked, performance study was performed in Grampian, Scotland. 165 people were invited to participate and, of those, 100 (61%) were examined. People suspected of having glaucoma underwent a full ophthalmic assessment both in a newly established, community optometry led, glaucoma management scheme and in a consultant led hospital eye service within a month. Results: The agreement between the AGO and the consultant ophthalmologist in the diagnosis of glaucoma was substantial (89%, kappa = 0.703, SE=0.083). The agreement regarding the need for treatment was also substantial (88%, kappa = 0.716, SE =0.076). The agreement between the trainee ophthalmologists and the consultant ophthalmologist in the diagnosis of glaucoma and treatment recommendation were moderate (83%, kappa = 0.541, SE = 0.098, SE = 0.98; and 81%, kappa = 0.553, SE = 0.90, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy of the optometrists in detecting glaucoma in this population was high for specificity (0.93 [95% CI 0.85 to 0.97]) but lower for sensitivity at 0.76 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.89). The performance was similar when accuracy was assessed for treatment recommendation (sensitivity, 0.73[95% CI 0.57 to 0.85]; specificity 0.96[95% CI 0.88 to 0.99]). The differences in sensitivity and specificity between AGO and junior ophthalmologist was not statistically significant.Conclusions: Community optometrists trained in glaucoma provided satisfactory decisions regarding diagnosis and initiation of treatment for glaucoma. With such additional training in glaucoma optometrists are at least as accurate as junior ophthalmologists but some cases of glaucoma missed.en
dc.description.sponsorshipChief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Departmenten
dc.format.extent293158 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJen
dc.subjectoptometryen
dc.subjectglaucomaen
dc.subjectophthalmologyen
dc.subjectdiagnosisen
dc.titleThe Accuracy of Accredited Glaucoma Optometrists in the Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendation for Glaucomaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record