Show simple item record

Photodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer : PHOTO RCT

dc.contributor.authorHeer, Rakesh
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Anne
dc.contributor.authorPenegar, Steven
dc.contributor.authorVadiveloo, Thenmalar
dc.contributor.authorClark, Emma
dc.contributor.authorYu, Ge
dc.contributor.authorMariappan, Paramananthan
dc.contributor.authorCresswell, Joanne
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, John
dc.contributor.authorN'Dow, James
dc.contributor.authorNabi, Ghulam
dc.contributor.authorMostafid, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorKelly, John
dc.contributor.authorRamsay, Craig
dc.contributor.authorLazarowicz, Henry
dc.contributor.authorAllan, Angela
dc.contributor.authorBreckons, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Karen
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Louise
dc.contributor.authorFeber, Andy
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Alison
dc.contributor.authorNorrie, John
dc.contributor.authorOrozco-Leal, Giovany
dc.contributor.authorRice, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorTandogdu, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Ernest
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Laura
dc.contributor.authorVale, Luke
dc.contributor.authorMacLennan, Graeme
dc.contributor.authorHall, Emma
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-04T00:12:21Z
dc.date.available2023-12-04T00:12:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-01
dc.identifier221981835
dc.identifierbc82de87-6099-4c06-8960-ea4c8e8eeda7
dc.identifier85140933265
dc.identifier36300825
dc.identifier.citationHeer , R , Lewis , R , Duncan , A , Penegar , S , Vadiveloo , T , Clark , E , Yu , G , Mariappan , P , Cresswell , J , McGrath , J , N'Dow , J , Nabi , G , Mostafid , H , Kelly , J , Ramsay , C , Lazarowicz , H , Allan , A , Breckons , M , Campbell , K , Campbell , L , Feber , A , McDonald , A , Norrie , J , Orozco-Leal , G , Rice , S , Tandogdu , Z , Taylor , E , Wilson , L , Vale , L , MacLennan , G & Hall , E 2022 , ' Photodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer : PHOTO RCT ' , Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) , vol. 26 , no. 40 , pp. 1-144 . https://doi.org/10.3310/PLPU1526en
dc.identifier.issn1366-5278
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0002-1039-5646/work/128322576
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0003-4043-7349/work/128322850
dc.identifier.urihttp://aura-test.abdn.ac.uk/handle/2164/19989
dc.descriptionFunding Information: The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 11/142/02. The contractual start date was in June 2014. The draft report began editorial review in February 2021 and was accepted for publication in July 2021. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report. Funding Information: This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, the HTA programme or the Department of Health and Social Care. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, the HTA programme or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding Information: Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Funding Information: The Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 ethics committee [Research Ethics Committee (REC) reference number 14/NE/1062] provided a favourable ethics opinion for this research in July 2014. The trial was sponsored by The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and is registered as ISRCTN84013636. Funding Information: This project is funded by a NIHR BRC Doctor of Philosophy studentship (Newcastle Award). Funding Information: The authors wish to thank the patients who participated in the PHOTO trial. We particularly acknowledge the late Rob Pickard for his contribution to the inception and design of the trial. We also wish to thank: • Helen Green (ICR-CTSU) for her secretarial support • the CHaRT programming team, led by Gladys McPherson (until 2016) and Mark Forrest (2016-present) • Lorna Henderson (CHaRT), who was involved in the statistical analysis of the trial until 2018 • Jing Shen (Newcastle), who was involved in the health economic analysis until 2019 • Laura Wilson for supporting the PHOTO-T study (2019 to present) • other staff in the CHaRT/Health Services Research Unit for their assistance with the trial (Lorna Aucott, Maria Ntessalen and Rebecca Bruce) • members of the TMG for their ongoing advice and support of the trial • the independent members of the TSC and DMC • the staff at the recruitment centres who facilitated the recruitment, treatment and follow-up of trial participants. Finally, we would like to thank NIHR and the HTA programme for funding the PHOTO trial. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Funding Information: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Heer et al.en
dc.format.extent144
dc.format.extent4195231
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)en
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subjectBLADDER CANCERen
dc.subjectNON-MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCERen
dc.subjectPHASE III: TRANSURETHRAL RESECTIONen
dc.subjectPHOTODYNAMIC DETECTIONen
dc.subjectRANDOMISED TRIALen
dc.subjectSURGERYen
dc.subjectTRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMOURen
dc.subjectURINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMSen
dc.subjectR Medicineen
dc.subjectHealth Policyen
dc.subject.lccRen
dc.titlePhotodynamic versus white-light-guided resection of first-diagnosis non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer : PHOTO RCTen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Health Services Research Uniten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Academic Urology Uniten
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Other Applied Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Institute of Applied Health Sciencesen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3310/PLPU1526
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140933265&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.vol26en
dc.identifier.iss40en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Hoesli_etal_JERER_Commercial_R ...
Size:
342.8Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record