Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGyőrfi, Tamás
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-20T00:03:24Z
dc.date.available2018-11-20T00:03:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.identifier101153551
dc.identifier8d9f30b6-8c07-4e2a-b964-f99e38b795a3
dc.identifier85034625576
dc.identifier.citationGyőrfi , T 2017 , ' Why Is the Equal Merit Principle (Almost) Straightforwardly Wrong? ' , Modern Law Review , vol. 80 , no. 6 , pp. 1052-1072 . https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12302en
dc.identifier.issn0026-7961
dc.identifier.otherORCID: /0000-0001-6639-5285/work/45185257
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2164/11471
dc.format.extent20
dc.format.extent267953
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofModern Law Reviewen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.subjectjudicial appointmentsen
dc.subjectmerit in judicial appointmentsen
dc.subjectequal meriten
dc.subjectjudicial diversityen
dc.subjectConstitutional Reform Act 2005en
dc.subjectCrime and Courts Act 2013en
dc.subjectK Lawen
dc.subject.lccKen
dc.titleWhy Is the Equal Merit Principle (Almost) Straightforwardly Wrong?en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Lawen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-2230.12302
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-11-20
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.modernlawreview.co.uk/november-2017/equal-merit-principle-almost-straightforwardly-wrong/en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record